Print This Post Email This Post

How do we answer M1910 for non-ambulatory patients?

Fri, May 7, 2010

Ask OASIS-Central

How do we answer M1910 for non-ambulatory patients?

Q: Our current OASIS-C M1910 Fall Risk Assessment utilizes the Missouri Alliance Multifactor Fall Risk Assessment and the Timed Up & Go Test (TUG). We are finding that patients who are not ambulatory can not be rated with the TUG and need to use a different standardized and validated test. Do you have any recommendations?

A: CMS has clarified that for an assessment tool to meet the criteria for a “yes” response on M1910, the assessment would need to have been validated as a tool that specifically measures risk for falls. If the patient is not able to participate in tasks required to allow the completion and scoring of the assessment(s), as would be the case in a non-ambulatory patient, a response of “0 – No multi-factor fall risk assessment conducted” should be reported.

, ,

This post was written by:

Lu Post

Lu Post, RN, MN, COS-C, is president of Home Care Institute, LLC, a technology-based company with a focus on the development of home care and hospice educational resources. She is certified as a clinical OASIS Specialist from the OASIS Certificate and Competency Board, Inc. Lu earned her bachelor’s degree in nursing from Georgia State University and her master’s degree as a clinical nurse specialist from Emory University in Atlanta. She has served in a variety of senior leadership and educational roles in some of the largest home care and hospice organizations in the country for over 20 years.

4 Responses to “How do we answer M1910 for non-ambulatory patients?”

  1. Tracy Horn Says:

    Because the pt is nonambulatory and a TUG assessment can’t be performed, can we use the Morse Fall Risk Assessment? It is validated tool and can be used on pt’s who are unable to get up out of bed.

  2. Lu Post
    Lu Post Says:

    CMS has stated that each agency is responsible for determining whether the risk assessments used meet reliability and validity requirements. It would be important for the agency to have sufficient evidence to support that the Morse Fall Risk Assessment was “scientifically tested on a population of community dwelling elders and shown to be effective in identifying people at risk for falls.” Most of the literature supports validity in the acute care and long-term care settings. A bedbound patient in the hospital managed around-the-clock by clinicians would have a different fall risk than one at home, in which an unskilled caregiver is assisting and transferring the patient. Both patients would score a “O” on the Morse Fall Risk Assessment related to Ambulatory Aid and Gait, which may not accurately reflect the patient’s risk in the home setting. In addition, the Morse tool does not take into account environment, medications and injury risk.

    At this point, because there is no CMS endorsement of specific tools, and because compliance with this item affects patient outcomes, agencies would need to feel comfortable the tool they use accurately reflects fall risk in the home setting.

  3. Marie Woodard Says:

    M1910 – is there an evidenced based practice tool to assess fall risk in the non-ambulatory patient in the home setting?

  4. Lu Post
    Lu Post Says:

    Currently, there is no validated assessment that evaluates fall risk for the non-ambulatory patient.


Leave a Reply

*