Tag Archive | "assessments/screenings"

Print This Post Email This Post

Q: For (M1730) Depression Screening, for what situation would a response of “NA” be used as opposed to a response of “0″?

Thu, Feb 24, 2011

0 Comments

Q: For (M1730) Depression Screening,  for what situation would a response of “NA” be used as opposed to a  response of “0″?

Q: For (M1730) Depression Screening,  for what situation would a response of “NA” be used as opposed to a  response of “0″? A: For (M1730) Depression Screening, a response of “NA” to the PHQ-2 scale would be used in patients who are unable to respond to the assessment, as in patients who are unresponsive. A [...]

Continue reading...
Print This Post Email This Post

If the answer to the depression screening, M1730 is positive and the agency does not have psychiatric services, besides notification to the MD and a referral for MSW, what process should be in place for follow up?

Wed, Aug 18, 2010

0 Comments

If the answer to the depression screening, M1730 is positive and the agency does not have psychiatric services, besides notification to the MD and a referral for MSW, what process should be in place for follow up?

Q: If the answer to the depression screening, M1730 is positive and the agency does not have psychiatric services, besides notification to the MD and a referral for MSW, what process should be in place for follow up? Should there be additional screening tools used such as the PHQ-9? Is it the nurse or the [...]

Continue reading...
Print This Post Email This Post

Using Standardized Tools to Improve Outcomes: Fall Risk Assessment

Tue, Jun 29, 2010

0 Comments

Using Standardized Tools to Improve Outcomes: Fall Risk Assessment

Since the implementation of OASIS-C, one of the most frequently asked questions refers to the utilization of standardized tools in assessments and screenings. The following is a breakdown of data elements which include the use of a standardized tool. M1910, fall risk assessment The data element: Has the patient had a multi-factor fall risk assessment [...]

Continue reading...
Print This Post Email This Post

What is the score in which a patient can be considered depressed and what should be done if the patient attains such a score?

Sun, Jun 20, 2010

0 Comments

What is the score in which a patient can be considered depressed and what should be done if the patient attains such a score?

Q: What is the score in which a patient can be considered depressed and what should be done if the patient attains such a score? A: If a homecare agency chooses to use the PHQ-2 scale for level-one screening of depression, a response is selected for each row and the points added together. If the [...]

Continue reading...
Print This Post Email This Post

Using Standardized Tools to Improve Outcomes

Wed, Jun 9, 2010

0 Comments

Using Standardized Tools to Improve Outcomes

Since the implementation of OASIS-C, one of the most frequently asked questions refers to the utilization of standardized tools in assessments and screenings. The following is a breakdown of data elements which include the use of a standardized tool. M1240, pain assessment The data element: Has the patient had a formal pain assessment using a [...]

Continue reading...
Print This Post Email This Post

Q: Which multi-factor tool should we use for falls risk assessment?

Thu, Jun 3, 2010

1 Comment

Q: Which multi-factor tool should we use for falls risk assessment?

Q: Which multi-factor tool should we use for fall risk assessment? A: Home health agencies are not mandated on which fall risk assessment tool they should use. In fact, like all process elements on the OASIS-C assessment, use of a standardized tool is optional. For M1910, Fall risk assessment, if a standardized tool is used, [...]

Continue reading...