OASIS-Central

In regards to M1910, if all factors are included is this a complete assessment? Or is another standarized protocol to be used?

Q: In regards to M1910, which asks has “the  patient had a multi-factor Fall Risk Assessment (such as falls history, use of multiple medications, mental impairment, toileting etc.”,  if all these factors are included is this a complete assessment? Or is another standardized protocol to be used? A: In order to answer “Yes” to M1910 [...]

Continue reading...

Fall Prevention Interventions: Evidence-Based Best Practices

Evidence-based practice is defined per the Disease Management Association of America as using the best scientific evidence available to guide clinical decision-making. Investigating scientific evidence such as best practice research that is available through the National Guideline Clearinghouse Web site (www.guidelines.com) or the APTA Web site (www.apta.org) leads agencies to multiple best practice components necessary [...]

Continue reading...

Using Standardized Tools to Improve Outcomes: Fall Risk Assessment

Since the implementation of OASIS-C, one of the most frequently asked questions refers to the utilization of standardized tools in assessments and screenings. The following is a breakdown of data elements which include the use of a standardized tool. M1910, fall risk assessment The data element: Has the patient had a multi-factor fall risk assessment [...]

Continue reading...

Q: Which multi-factor tool should we use for falls risk assessment?

Q: Which multi-factor tool should we use for fall risk assessment? A: Home health agencies are not mandated on which fall risk assessment tool they should use. In fact, like all process elements on the OASIS-C assessment, use of a standardized tool is optional. For M1910, Fall risk assessment, if a standardized tool is used, [...]

Continue reading...

How do we answer M1910 for non-ambulatory patients?

Q: Our current OASIS-C M1910 Fall Risk Assessment utilizes the Missouri Alliance Multifactor Fall Risk Assessment and the Timed Up & Go Test (TUG). We are finding that patients who are not ambulatory can not be rated with the TUG and need to use a different standardized and validated test. Do you have any recommendations? [...]

Continue reading...

Is the Missouri Alliance Multifactor Fall Risk Assessment tool considered “standardized”?

Q: Is the Missouri Alliance Multifactor Fall Risk Assessment considered a “standardized tool” for use in the new OASIS C data collection tool? A: While the tool was listed on the MedQIC website, The NAHC report released a CMS response on 12/17/09, which indicated that the Missouri tool did not meet the requirements for validation. [...]

Continue reading...